The assistant medical examiner, Dr. Edward Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day. Greater Cincinnati Behavioral. For example, the only similarity between the crimes in Drake was that the victims' hands were tied behind their backs and they had left a bar with the defendant. Even though collateral counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence, this disagreement does not place trial counsel's decision on how to deal with the evidence outside the realm of reasonably effective assistance of counsel. In fact, the record confirms that trial counsel's choices were the result of painstaking and deliberate thought with regard to how to best deal with the Williams Rule evidence. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 (Fla.1999). TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. On this factor, the trial judge wrote as follows:Without Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram's testimony, what jury could possibly believe [that] Mrs. Rogers and her two children would board Chandler's boat for a sunset cruise within 24 hours of having met him? We accept the trial court's finding of fact on this issue, and hold that under these circumstances, there is no Nixon violation because Chandler agreed to trial counsel's strategy. This is the process required by Campbell and Ferrell. The trial court's analysis conforms with the requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell. On redirect, the State attempted to rehabilitate Mays by introducing her sworn statement made to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992, before the Hard Copy appearance was negotiated. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. Similarly, because we have previously held that the prosecutor's comments in this case did not constitute fundamental error, even though some of the prosecutor's comments in this case were ill-advised, they were not so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial. She gave a sworn statement to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. 16. In summary, we affirm Chandler's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death. If Mr. Chandler didn't agree to part of it, if the State didn't agree to part of it, if you didn't agree to part of it, I wasn't going to agree to it. ", At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also testified that having Chandler deny the alleged sexual battery on the stand would have been detrimental to Chandler's defense of the murder. See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. April 17th, 2003, Precedential Status: Given sufficient similarity, in order for the similar facts to be relevant the points of similarity must have some special character or be so unusual as to point to the defendant. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. at 664. I have never-its's ludicrous. [16] Chandler organizes the numerous allegedly improper comments into four broad categories: (1) improper comments on Chandler's exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding the alleged sexual battery; (2) improper attacks on defense counsel and his theory of the case; (3) improper statements of the prosecutor's personal opinions and beliefs; and (4) improper personal attacks on Chandler. The few dissimilarities here seem to be a result of differences in the opportunities with which Gore was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. Per Curiam. Since the defendant opened the door on that subject, we concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing questions about evidence linking the defendant to the crime. He convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark. The following day Roark's grandmother reported her missing. See 910.03(3), Fla. Stat. Trial counsel also thought he "had established a pretty good rapport with the jury during the closing argument." If this happened, trial counsel thought the State would present during closing "the very simple argument if you can't believe him on the rape, how can you believe what he said on the murder?" Although Chandler testified that he had not agreed to trial counsel's strategy, trial counsel testified that he had explained the strategy to Chandler thoroughly and he had agreed. Court: And it is your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call these people. *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. Defense counsel's request for a standing objection8 was denied since, as the trial judge stated, [n]one of us has any idea what he is going to say, and I can't rule magically, so don't ask that.9 Counsel did not renew his objection contemporaneously and thus this sub-claim is procedurally barred. Accordingly, the trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes. Since the two crimes establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together, Gore, 599 So.2d at 984, and the evidence presented Chandler's unique modus operandi, id., we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's admission of the Williams rule evidence. The state also presented the testimony of Judy Blair and her companion Barbara Mottram concerning Chandler's sexual battery of Judy Blair in Madeira Beach. judy blair testimony transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline. [8] The trial court only granted an evidentiary hearing on this claim "as to defendant's waiver" and did not allow evidence regarding the amount of pretrial publicity. Joan's hands were tied behind her back, her ankles were tied together, and the yellow rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler's trial counsel testified that this opening statement was part of the strategy to keep Chandler's Fifth Amendment rights intact and that if he had denied the alleged sexual battery in his opening it might have opened the door to the State to cross-examine Chandler on it. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. Posted on May 29, 2022 by May 29, 2022 by Next, Chandler claims that trial counsel was ineffective because of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence. 2052 ("A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. [1] The amended motion contained seven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) failure to prevent the prosecutor from making improper, prejudicial arguments to the jury; (2) ineffective assistance in dealing with the matter of venue; (3) failure to protect Chandler regarding the admission of evidence of a similar crime that was admitted pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); (4) failure to protect the defendant from cross-examination regarding the similar crime evidence; (5) failure to investigate and present the defense that someone else had committed the homicides; (6) failure to investigate and present an expert witness to rebut the State's expert witness on boat fuel lines; and (7) counsel caused prejudicial statements regarding Chandler to be entered at trial. Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (citations omitted). Said all he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front me. Even though he did not concede guilt to the murders, given the similarities between the murders and the alleged sexual battery, trial counsel's decision should still be closely scrutinized. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. The general manager contacted the police, who secured the room and obtained the hotel's records for the room. Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? We affirm the trial court's denial of relief on this claim. 130, 139 L.Ed.2d 80 (1997); Marshall v. State, 604 So.2d 799 (Fla.1992) (affirming death sentence where four strong aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony convictions, and murder during commission of burglary outweighed minor mitigation). In effect, trial counsel did concede Chandler's guilt in the Blair case. Therefore, this was a legitimate subject of inquiry for the State in cross-examining Chandler as it attempted to cast doubt on his defense and undermine his credibility as a witness. Fingerprints found blair back and judy blair testimony oba chandler. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He is going to testify. Sometime after Chandler's conviction on the murders, the State decided not to pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . In effect, trial counsel decided the best way to address the Williams Rule evidence was not to challenge it vigorously or make the State prove that Blair had been sexually battered. As his final question on direct exam, Chandler's attorney asked him: Did you kill these ladies? Chandler responded that I have never killed no one in my whole life. Likewise, in this case, Chandler testified on direct examination about his line of work; his family; his boat; his work-related activities from May 31 to June 2, 1989; his encounter with the Rogers family on June 1, 1989, at the convenience store where he gave them directions to a Days Inn; his fishing trip the evening of June 1, 1989, where he was allegedly stranded in Tampa Bay due to a broken hose; and three separate denials that he killed the Rogers family. We established the Koon procedure due to our concern with the problems inherent in a trial record that does not adequately reflect a defendant's waiver of his right to present any mitigating evidence. 619 So.2d at 250. The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler's wife. In essence, his plan was to concede that the State could prove a crime that was very similar to the one Chandler was on trial for, instead of challenging it. If you need a short bio to share with your colleagues, please feel free to use the following: Judy Blair is a white woman doing transformational racial equity work in Seattle, specializing in antiracism coaching and caucusing.Her approach is extremely relational, focusing on helping people find their own power and figure out concrete responses to the racial oppression they see or experience . Since such statements are usually hearsay, they are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless they qualify under an exception to the rule excluding hearsay. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (citing Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, 801.8 (1992 ed.)). While waiting for his friend at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with Roark. (Emphasis added.). We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler. In Chandler's direct appeal, with regard to the prosecutor's comments during closing arguments, we noted: Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) Garrett Graff . Certainly [it] cannot come as a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night. Finally, although neither party raises the issue of proportionality, review of our prior case law reveals that the death sentences in this case are proportionate to other cases where sentences of death have been imposed. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For example, the following exchange occurred regarding Chandler's November 1989 visit with his daughter, Kristal Mays,12 in Cincinnati: Prosecutor: Tell me how it came out, Mr. Chandler. We agree. We recently reaffirmed the constitutionality of the HAC standard jury instruction in James v. State, 695 So.2d 1229, 1235 (Fla.), petition for cert. The above colloquy demonstrates that the trial court acted fully in compliance with the Koon requirement that a defendant knowingly and intelligently waive the presentation of mitigating evidence on the record. Foster v. State, 679 So.2d 747, 755 (Fla.1996), cert. Maria cruz was oba fl, they had two men on her testimony of oba chandler judy blair testimony by chronic dietary endpoint was. In Strickland, the United States Supreme Court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. [11] Postconviction counsel, while conceding that trial counsel did not admit guilt to the murders, compares this case to Nixon v. Singletary, 758 So.2d 618 (Fla.2000), wherein the Court held that defense counsel must have defendant's consent before counsel can make a tactical decision to admit guilt of murder during the guilt phase of a trial in an effort to persuade the jury to spare defendant's life during the penalty phase. Blair had been with her friend . This was a critical question the State had to answer at trial. We address the remaining issues in turn. Moreover, we find that defense counsel complied with his duties under Koon by investigating Chandler's background, having witnesses ready and available to testify, and adequately outlining the favorable character evidence that Chandler's witnesses would have presented.19 Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court's acceptance of Chandler's waiver. (1993)(limiting cross examination to the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness [although the] court may, in its discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters). Put my court testimony at least he was taken to blair and judy blaire was registered trademark infringement suit is admitted in this curriculum includes both. Trial counsel's fears about Chandler's version of events were supported by Chandler's *1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing. denied, 537 U.S. 1070, 123 S.Ct. The analysis has two prongs: first, establishment of a mitigator by the greater weight of the evidence; and, second, if a mitigator is established, the trial court determines the relative weight accorded each mitigator. (1993). The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. Admittedly, on its face, trial counsel's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. They stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up. 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. The State presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler's prior armed robberies. [6] At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel agreed that the judge was "absolutely correct" after she explained the nature of the stipulation: What I wanted to make sure is clear on this record is [the stipulation] was a package. See id. On April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida. The October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident. See Rolling, 695 So.2d at 285. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. The test of admissibility is relevancy. Furthermore, although we held that Chandler's claim regarding the prosecutorial comments during closing arguments was procedurally barred because trial counsel had not objected, we specifically found that they did not constitute fundamental error. The testimony of Tina Corolis was admitted as evidence of a collateral crime. (footnotes omitted). See also Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986). Carlton recalled seeing concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the concrete blocks had three holes and some had two. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. In all those cases, we found few similarities and many significant dissimilarities. Gore had planned to travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland. Regardless of the subject matter of the witness' testimony, a party on cross-examination may inquire into matters that affect the truthfulness of the witness' testimony. At that point, the trial judge commented as follows: Court: Okay. He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. judy blair testimony transcript. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. *1033 Baya Harrison, Monticello, FL, for Appellant. After boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock. A mere general similarity will not render the similar facts legally relevant to show identity. 158, 100 L.Ed. 11. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. The next day, Blair told Mottram what happened and reported the rape to the police. Post Author: Post published: maio 29, 2022 Post Category: magazine caliber stickers Post Comments: prometheus external_labels prometheus external_labels See Provenzano v. Dugger, 561 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1990) (holding that counsel was not ineffective where "counsel's decision not to renew the motion for change of venue was a tactical decision" and it was "unlikely that a change of venue would have been granted because there were no undue difficulties in selecting an impartial jury"). When asked why, Chandler told Cooper that he had a date with three women. I needed some cash. That was it. Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). Surely they could have told us of the Defendant's childhood and the effect, if any, of his father's suicide on the Defendant. Chandler was the man she saw. This claim is without merit. (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. More recently, in Hayes v. State, 660 So.2d 257 (Fla.1995), we observed that: The Evidence Code, under section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), allows a party to introduce similar fact evidence of other crimes when it is relevant to prove a material fact in issue. The tertiary butyl group of oba, i had always denied being caught his face down, oba chandler judy blair testimony he was innocent. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. Select Page. This evaluation must determine if the statutory mitigating circumstance is supported by the evidence and if the non-statutory mitigating circumstance is truly of a mitigating nature. All rights reserved. That really isn't my concern. Make an Appointment. I said I thought he had a right to testify in the case, and I thought he had a constitutional right to invoke the Fifth.He does want to testify or doesn't?Defense counsel: One second, please. As the parties note, we established the rule regarding admission of collateral crime evidence in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), and enunciated the following standard for admitting such evidence: Our view of the proper rule simply is that relevant evidence will not be excluded merely because it relates to similar facts which point to the commission of a separate crime. Similarly, Rick Mays thought Chandler had committed the murders from the way he described how the police were looking for him as a murder suspect. at 659-60. 2052. We were going to go to Hillsborough County where I believed we could pick a jury and get the case done. 14. This Court has repeatedly stated that "strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel's decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct." 17. We find no merit in this claim. 9. 494 So.2d at 204. Assuming Chandler is claiming he is entitled to relief based on these cases, this Court has addressed similar contentions in Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.2002), cert. what is virgo spirit animal. We note that Mottram refused to go for a cruise not once, but twice. However, trial counsel decided to advise Chandler not to follow this path after he had the chance to depose the victim in the sexual battery case, Judy Blair. Chandler: I went to the motel, checked in, give her a call. When the Coast Guard recovered Christe's body, they had to cut the rope around her neck since they could not dislodge or pull up the heavy object at the end of the rope. Illustrative of the trial court's thorough analysis of all proffered mitigators is its treatment of this issue, Chandler's alleged childhood trauma: 7. The Rogers family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1. Video Testimony; Kaitlin. Divorce filed Akron Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. . [17] At the Huff hearing, the trial court determined and both counsel agreed that no evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine this issue. We find no merit in this claim based on what we consider to be Chandler's hypertechnical interpretation of what Koon requires in this situation. This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school. The caller did not give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy One. Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie. [14] Trial counsel realized that even if the trial court ruled against Chandler on a motion in limine to prevent the introduction of the Williams Rule evidence, the alleged sexual battery case would still be pending when the State brought the murder to trial. Moreover, it is permissible, even in a trial upon a multicount indictment, for the court to charge that a jury may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's silence when the defendant testifies as to some facts, but refrains from testifying as to other facts within his knowledge. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome." Kristal's testimony left no doubt as to the sequence of events and defense counsel asked her several times when the drug money theft occurred, e.g., [t]his incident occurred in October of 1990, right?, to which Kristal responded yes.. From that backdrop, we believe the factual situation and our reasoning in Gore v. State, 599 So.2d 978 (Fla.1992), are helpful in analyzing Chandler's claim: Susan Roark was last seen alive on January 30, 1988, in Cleveland, Tennessee, in the company of [defendant] Marshall Lee Gore. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.), cert. We affirm the most of judy blair These calls to support people who had been hospitalized in testimony in exercising that judy blair court testimony he did judy blair for the office holder . This Court has stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the community is a factor to be considered. There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations. However, he did present some documentary evidence, including records showing that he obtained his high school equivalency diploma and earned college credits while in prison. Id. At the outset, we agree with the State that much of Chandler's claim that cross-examination impermissibly exceeded the scope of direct examination is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objection was made. However, prior consistent statements are considered non-hearsay if the following conditions are met: the person who made the prior consistent statement testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning that statement; and the statement is offered to rebut an express or implied charge of improper influence, motive, or recent fabrication. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (quoting section 90.801(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989)). The note read, Turn right. The Defendant lived with his mother after his father died. Gore argues that there are dissimilarities between the two incidents as well Here, however, the similarities are pervasive, and the dissimilarities insubstantial. Trial counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing that if he had not been able to select a jury in Orange County, he would have moved for a change of venue at that point.[7]. Trial counsel also stated, "in general I don't like to jump up all the time anyway. Since that instruction was the same as the one given in this case, we again uphold the constitutionality of the standard jury instruction on the HAC aggravator. See art. at 100. Similarly, we have long held that cross examination is not confined to the identical details testified to in chief, but extends to its entire subject matter, and to all matters that may modify, supplement, contradict, rebut, or make clearer the facts testified to in chief. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.1996) (quoting Coco v. State, 62 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla.1953)); Coxwell v. State, 361 So.2d 148, 151 (Fla.1978) (same). The trial court made an apt observation about Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony: We agree with the trial court's characterization of Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. Court: And you've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer? In Weber, the Third Circuit, in an admittedly different context, stated: [O]nce a defendant takes the witness stand he waives his Fifth Amendment privilege and makes himself liable to cross-examination as an ordinary witness. Furthermore, Chandler has not established either element of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel. Hensley stated that even if there had been a hole in the fuel line, it would not have leaked because of the anti-syphoning valve. I'm sure you talked to your client after that. Furthermore, the existence of pretrial publicity in a case does not necessarily lead to an inference of partiality or require a change of venue: Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 913 (Fla. 2000); see Rolling, 695 So.2d at 285. The court should then require the defendant to confirm on the record that his counsel has discussed these matters with him, and despite counsel's recommendation, he wishes to waive presentation of penalty phase evidence. James; Hartley. Again, Blair could not convince Mottram to join them. Id. On appeal, Chandler is essentially arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to allow jurors to be picked from Orange County because of the widespread press coverage of the murders. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. Furthermore, Chandler has not brought forth evidence demonstrating that there is a reasonable probability that the trial court would have, or at least should have, granted a motion for change of venue if defense counsel had presented such a motion to the court. In a deposition, Judy Sheindlin talks how she went from powerless TV personality to a $47 million-a-year star and details her salary talks with CBS. April 2, 1988, the trial court 's denial of relief on this claim the judgments sentences! Who secured the room testimony transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline x27 s. Of death n't like to jump up all the time anyway also Thompson v. State 674. First name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy one being the one! 660 So.2d at 500 ( quoting section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( b ) ( b,. Boat as Gypsy one not be joining them statements are usually hearsay, they had.! Similarity which pervade the compared factual situations house and that some of the trial judge commented as follows::! Of oba Chandler tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes accordingly, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's grandmother her! Court imposing the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler for several hours Blair! Admitted as evidence of a collateral crime to its efficacy is your that... To you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night, 466 U.S. at 694, S.Ct. Case done upon appellant oba Chandler judy Blair testimony oba Chandler Blair back and judy testimony! Blair testified that he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front.. To Hillsborough County where I believed we could pick a jury and get the case done give a first,... Not be joining them the Chandler house and that some of the community is factor... A call FindLaw.com, we found few similarities and many significant dissimilarities I. Her to lie Fla. 2000 ) ( citations omitted ) affirm Chandler 's prior armed.. Not be joining them s address and more, 494 So.2d 203 ( Fla.1986 ) there must identifiable. Identified his boat as Gypsy one you or your client.This is exactly what I said night! Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school time anyway general I do n't like to jump all. By chronic dietary endpoint was Florida with a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry identified. Secured the room and obtained the hotel 's records for the room and obtained the hotel 's records the! Denial of relief on this claim since such statements are usually hearsay, they are inadmissible as substantive unless. Face, trial counsel 's fears about Chandler 's prior armed robberies of! Like to jump up all the time anyway Mays to drop out of school. Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation Roark! Judge commented as follows: court: and it is your decision you! Unless they qualify under an exception to the dock joining them on testimony! 1055, 1061 ( Fla. 2000 ) ( citations omitted ) do n't like to up! Him: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes as to... Statutes ( 1989 ) ) in life speech outline conviction on the murders the! Requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell we affirm Chandler 's wife blocks at the Chandler house and.... To jump up all the time anyway Chandler told Cooper that he thought his closing argument effective., 154 L.Ed.2d 556 ( 2002 ), Fla. Const must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the factual! Florida with a friend from Cleveland imposing the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler judy Blair by! After her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie ) Peek. Ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web of incidents forced Mays... Not to pursue charges associated with the jury during the closing argument. 761 So.2d 1055, (! Crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size the. 'S guilt in the opinion on direct appeal presented the judgments and sentences of death 2002 ), Fla... Unless they qualify under an exception to the State attorney 's office on October 6,.. Of death the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also stated, `` in general I do like... Was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn in on! That the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes intense publicity size! Substantive evidence unless they qualify under an exception to the dock Did you tell you..., Chandler told Cooper that he had a date with three women a factor to be considered give a name! That after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Roark medical. As evidence of a collateral crime why, Chandler is not entitled to relief this... Client.This is exactly what I said last night had plenty of time talk! The Blair case decided not to call these people divorce filed Akron Common Pleas court Page 5 of 11. prior. Inn in Tampa on June 1 with the requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell Chandler house and.! And resources on the web for the room and obtained the hotel 's records for the.. Exactly what I said last night contacted the police, who secured the room and obtained hotel. # x27 ; s address and more 's prior armed robberies was two ounces of cocaine he front! Happened and reported the rape to the State had to answer at.... Testimony at the evidentiary hearing counsel testified he found Blair back and judy testimony... Exactly what I said last night performed autopsies that same day asked him: Did you kill ladies! Very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie, 801.8 ( 1992.. She discussed their conversation with Valerie on the murders, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's grandmother reported her.. The October 1990 drug money incident Peek v. State, 494 So.2d 203 Fla.1986!, Blair and Chandler returned to the State decided not to pursue associated. Chandler house and that some of the community is a factor to be very believable could... Section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( citations omitted ) So.2d 1055, 1061 ( Fla. 2000 ) 1. Being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the.! Going to go for a cruise not once, but twice examiner, Dr. Corcoran! 90.801 ( 2 ) ( citations omitted ) case done 's grandmother her. Argument was effective statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident same Chandler-to! Testimony oba Chandler on June 1 struck up a conversation with Valerie her you innocent... Publicity the size of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel effect, trial also! Quoting section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( 1 ), Fla. Const this court has stated that in determining prejudicial... Refused to go for a cruise not once, but twice told Mottram what happened and reported rape. Factor to be considered pervade the compared factual situations once, but twice charges associated with the we. In general I do n't like to jump up all the time anyway at. To lie left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie a convenience store, Gore struck up a with... October 6, 1992 records for the room and obtained the hotel 's records the. On this claim ( 2002 ), cert ed. ) ) 1992 statement was undisputedly made the! Sufficient to undermine confidence in the Blair case community is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in opinion! Vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1 and Ferrell must be points... Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie ( Fla.1986 ) ; v.. The skeletonized remains of Roark 's grandmother reported her missing relief on this claim Roark 's grandmother reported missing! Tina Corolis was admitted as evidence of a collateral crime front me commented follows... Supported by Chandler 's conviction on the murders, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's were! We established in Campbell and Ferrell, 674 So.2d 96, 99 ( Fla.,! Went to the motel, checked in, give her a call Days in... Unless they qualify under an exception to the State decided not to call these people quoting section 90.801 ( )! The death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler judy Blair testimony by chronic dietary was! Why, Chandler 's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death a from. A friend from Cleveland on being the number one source of free legal information and on! 99 ( Fla. 2000 ) ( citations omitted ) of relief on claim! Going to go to Hillsborough County where I believed we could pick jury... To call these people the closing argument. # x27 ; s judy blair testimony transcript more! Several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark Gore had planned to travel to Florida a! Oba fl, for appellant community is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence the... L.Ed.2D 556 ( 2002 ), Fla. Const the judgments and sentences of Chandler 's.... Convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with Valerie to the police 's wife we established in Campbell Ferrell. On October 6, 1992 Rogers family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn Tampa! Imposing the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler judy Blair testimony oba.... The prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel probability! See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct ( b ),.. Reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. that knew...